Difference between revisions of "Scope: what’s covered (and not!) in this wiki"
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|'''SWAT''', Soil and Water Assessment Tool | |'''SWAT''', Soil and Water Assessment Tool | ||
| − | |ArcSWAT2012 | + | |SWAT2012; ArcSWAT2012 |
|Arnold et al., 1998; | |Arnold et al., 1998; | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
These were chosen as commonly used, accessible, and/or promoted versions of the modelling platforms at the time of the project (2019-21) from which this wiki was developed. ACRU, SPATSIM-Pitman, and SWAT are curated by university research groups and there are many versions of these platforms that were developed by researchers for specific studies. These may appear in published research articles, but may not be easily accessible for a general user. | These were chosen as commonly used, accessible, and/or promoted versions of the modelling platforms at the time of the project (2019-21) from which this wiki was developed. ACRU, SPATSIM-Pitman, and SWAT are curated by university research groups and there are many versions of these platforms that were developed by researchers for specific studies. These may appear in published research articles, but may not be easily accessible for a general user. | ||
| − | + | The SWAT2012 version of SWAT describes the model units and process algorithm options. Models can be optionally built and operationalised in a GIS environment, using '''ArcSWAT2012''' with ArcGIS ESRI software and '''Q-SWA'''T with Q-GIS software. ArcSWAT2012 was primarily used in this project and is the version referred to in the inter-comparison pages. | |
| − | + | A new and accessible version of SWAT, called '''SWAT+''' was newly launched during the inception of this project. Most of it's core algorithms are the same as SWAT2012, however it's user interface has changed and SWAT+ includes runoff routing from specified hillslope areas to floodplain areas. This is a significant change to the landscape process representation. | |
| + | |||
| + | == Coverage of structural options within modelling tools == | ||
| + | All of the tools reviewed have some flexibility in how a catchment model can be set-up. This adds a layer of complexity when trying to compare approaches across tools. In this review an effort has been made to document and consider the main structural options available and approaches considered ‘typical’ for each; however, it should be noted that not all potential options have been covered. | ||
| + | |||
| + | A description of how this was handled for the modelling tools reviewed in the wiki is given [[Coverage of structural options within modelling tools|here]]. This is perhaps most important for MIKE-SHE which has the largest number of structural options. | ||
Revision as of 11:06, 7 June 2021
A central focus of this wiki is helping modellers to make informed choices about their model structures and modelling tool selection. The intention is to help users compare across modelling tool types more easily by describing different aspects of them side-by-side. Each modelling project will have it's own needs and constraints. There will almost always be multiple modelling tools that would be similarly suitable. For this reason this wiki will describe issues that need to be considered when applying a given tool in a particular case, and let the user decide how to weight the various factors involved.
This wiki focuses on catchment-scale hydrological modelling, rather than plot-scale, hillslope-scale, or global-scale modelling of water movement.
At present this wiki does not cover specifically groundwater-focused modelling tools (e.g. MODFLOW) or hydraulics-focused tools (e.g. HEC-RAS).
NB: Modelling tools intended for catchment hydrological modelling necessarily include some level of representation of groundwater storage and fluxes and of river channel flows. However this is generally far more simplified than groundwater-focused and hydraulic modelling tools. Recognition of the need for more detailed representation of groundwater and channel/floodplain hydraulics in some catchment modelling contexts has led to integration of algorithms developed and used in these more specific tools into catchment modelling tools, such as the MIKE-SHE modelling platform.
At present this wiki does not cover modelling of sediment transport or other water quality parameters, although some of the focus modelling tools do have these capabilities.
This wiki is aimed at readers who a have at least a basic background in hydrology and exposure to catchment hydrological modelling. It is not intended to replace courses or foundational instructional material on hydrology and modelling in general or on the use of specific modelling tools. One needs a solid grounding in hydrology before getting into catchment modelling and it is necessary to go through theory and user manuals or other documentation of a modelling tool being used. This wiki describes and compares various aspects of different modelling tools, but is by no means an exhaustive coverage of any, and cannot replace reading the tool's supporting material.
Modelling software tools & versions covered
The modelling tools included in the detailed comparison in this wiki are:
| Modelling tool | Version | References |
|---|---|---|
| ACRU, Agricultural Catchment Research Unit model | ACRU4 | Schulze, 1986, 1995; Schulze and Davis, 2018 |
| WRSM-Pitman, Water Resources System Model | WRSM2000 | Pitman, 1973; Bailey and Pitman, 2015 |
| SPATSIM-Pitman, Spatial and Time Series Information Modelling | IWR (GWv3) | Pitman, 1973; Hughes, 2005 |
| SWAT, Soil and Water Assessment Tool | SWAT2012; ArcSWAT2012 | Arnold et al., 1998; |
| MIKE-SHE (& MIKE-Hydro), Système Hydrologique Européen | MIKE-SHE 2020 | Abbott et al., 1986; DHI, 2014; Refsgaard and Storm, 1995 |
These were chosen as commonly used, accessible, and/or promoted versions of the modelling platforms at the time of the project (2019-21) from which this wiki was developed. ACRU, SPATSIM-Pitman, and SWAT are curated by university research groups and there are many versions of these platforms that were developed by researchers for specific studies. These may appear in published research articles, but may not be easily accessible for a general user.
The SWAT2012 version of SWAT describes the model units and process algorithm options. Models can be optionally built and operationalised in a GIS environment, using ArcSWAT2012 with ArcGIS ESRI software and Q-SWAT with Q-GIS software. ArcSWAT2012 was primarily used in this project and is the version referred to in the inter-comparison pages.
A new and accessible version of SWAT, called SWAT+ was newly launched during the inception of this project. Most of it's core algorithms are the same as SWAT2012, however it's user interface has changed and SWAT+ includes runoff routing from specified hillslope areas to floodplain areas. This is a significant change to the landscape process representation.
Coverage of structural options within modelling tools
All of the tools reviewed have some flexibility in how a catchment model can be set-up. This adds a layer of complexity when trying to compare approaches across tools. In this review an effort has been made to document and consider the main structural options available and approaches considered ‘typical’ for each; however, it should be noted that not all potential options have been covered.
A description of how this was handled for the modelling tools reviewed in the wiki is given here. This is perhaps most important for MIKE-SHE which has the largest number of structural options.