Model units & connections

This page describes how modelling tools allow users to discretise catchments into modelled units in order to represent and calculate hydrological processes. Differentiating the catchment into separate components or units, such as subcatchments, patches of similar land cover, or soil layers with distinct properties, allows hydrological processes to be modelled by algorithms that have been developed for that scale and type of unit.

Each modelling tool has a unique way of describing a catchment in terms of:

• The types surface and subsurface model units that can be included
• The connections that can be defined between these different units
• The process algorithms that are used to calculate inflows, storage, and outflows for each unit

To set up a model of a catchment that is relevant to our conceptual understanding of flows through that catchment, we need to pay attention to these modelling units and how they are or are not connected to one another. A flow path that we think is important in the catchment being modelled, and for the purpose of the modelling project, may not be represented in models built with certain tools. For example, not all tools allow channel transmission losses in rivers, and those that do differ in where the water goes after leaving the model channel. When a flow path cannot be explicitly included, one may be able to represent it implicitly or using a work-around, or one may chose to use another modelling tool. In addition, understanding how different units used by the modelling tool work with one another informs how one decides to discretise the catchment. For example, some tools only allow reservoirs or dams that can be used for irrigation sources to be located at the outlet of a subcatchment. This may influence the subcatchment delineation used to set-up the model.

This page summarises the unit types and connection options (i.e. flow paths) available across the tools, while their process algorithms are described on a processes page here. Although described on separate pages, the approach to unit and layer discretisation and the process algorithms used are inextricably linked. This page summarises some implications of these structural differences across the tools, which are dealt with in more detail for some specific model application contexts here.

The material on this page may go into more depth than you might be looking for. If all you need is a very brief overview of the structures and capabilities of the different modelling tools, that summary info can be found on the capabilities page, here.

Basic approaches for representing catchments in the different modelling tools

The schematic diagrams and tables below describe the main discretisation approaches used in each tool in terms of breaking up catchments into units and specifying linkages. For MIKE-SHE, because the tool offers many options, two generalised set-up approaches have been described (more background on these is given here).

Subcatchment delineation: Demonstration of: (a) a catchment area delineated into subcatchments and (b) the flow network connections of these subcatchments when used as model units. This approach is used to some degree in all the modelling tools covered (except MIKE-SHE when fully distributed). Subcatchments 4,5,6,8 are not headwaters and their river channels receive flow from upstream subcatchments. Figures from: Schulze, R.E. (1995). Hydrology and Agrohydrology: A Text to Accompany the ACRU 3.00 Agrohydrological Modelling System (Water Research Commission).	Subcatchments as units for process modelling: Diagram illustrating the approach taken in SPATSIM-Pitman of using the subcatchment as the primary unit for representing processes. Flow through the subcat can be conceptualised as flow through a generalised hillslope, which provides a means of modelling groundwater flow and exchange with the river channel. Special subareas (e.g. irrigated crops) impact the subcat's infiltration, surface runoff, ET, and recharge. Interflow and aquifer exchange with the channel are calculated based on the resulting subcatchment-scale storage. WRSM-Pitman & SWAT follow a related approach for groundwater in that aquifers are modelled at the subcatchment scale. Figures from: Hughes, D.A. (2004). Incorporating groundwater recharge and discharge functions into an existing monthly rainfall–runoff model. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 49.	Modular network of modelling units: Example WRSM-Pitman model network diagram (catchment of the Churchill Dam, quaternaries K90A&B), demonstrating a catchment composed of modules linked by routes. Subcatchment boundaries are not set-up in the tool; however, sets of linked modules are subcats in effect. (Also, though shown as separate units, each 'irrigation module' is modelled as part of a specified 'runoff module' for groundwater modelling.) ACRU4 uses a similar modular network approach, although ACRU units are grouped into subcatchments. Figure from: Bailey, A.K., and Pitman, W.V. (2015). Water Resources of South Africa 2012 Study (WR2012) (Water Research Commission).
Networks of modelling units within subcatchments: Demonstration ACRU4 model network diagram showing HRUs (as coloured squares), river channel, and dam units grouped within subcatchments. Climate can be input at the subcatchment scale and certain relationships may only be allowed between units in the same subcatchment (e.g. routing HRU subsurface flow to a special riparian HRU). The figure also shows that withdrawals and external inputs can be included for rivers and dams. Figure from: Clark, D.J., Smithers, J.C., Thornton-Dibb, S.L.C., and Lutchminarian, A. (2012). ACRU 4 User Manual: User Interface & Tutorials in Volume 3 of Deployment, Maintenance, & Further Development of SPATSIM-HDSF. (Water Research Commission).		HRUs as units for process modelling: Schematic diagram of process representation for an HRU (hydrological response unit) in ACRU4. Each HRU includes a groundwater/baseflow store. SWAT2012 also uses HRUs to model surface and shallow subsurface processes, but models groundwater at the subcatchment scale. Figure modified from: Schulze, R.E. (1995). Hydrology and Agrohydrology: A Text to Accompany the ACRU 3.00 Agrohydrological Modelling System (Water Research Commission).
Routing runoff from units in parallel or in series: Demonstration of subcatchment delineation into topographic units, which could serve as HRUs or process modelling zones, and related routing options. Runoff from each unit could be routed directly to the stream in parallel, or routed from one unit to the next in a downslope series. Series routing allows processes (infiltration, recharge, saturation seepage, etc) to occur along the path depending on states of downslope units (dry/saturated, flat/steep, rough/smooth, etc). It adds computational complexity. Different approaches can be more appropriate, or more important, in different settings, spatial scales, and for different runoff components (i.e. surface flow, interflow, groundwater flow). SPATSIM subareas in subcats modify subcat-scale runoff; no separate routing needed. WRSM's afforestation & alien veg modules are similar (act inside 'runoff modules'), but irrigation module surface runoff and interflow are routed in parallel to the linked 'runoff module'. ACRU4 routes all HRU 'quickflow' runoff in parallel and can optionally route 'baseflow' runoff into the soil of a specified 'riparian HRU'. SWAT2012 routes all HRU surface and 'lateral' (interflow) runoff in parallel, while groundwater is modelled at the subcat scale. MIKE-SHE grid cells are connected in series. If 'overland flow zones' are used, surface runoff can be routed in series or in parallel. If interflow and baseflow linear reservoirs are used, interflow is routed in series and groundwater in parallel (if multiple aquifers used).
3D grid cells as units for process modelling: Illustration of the approach used in MIKE-SHE for modelling processes using a 3D grid, i.e. grid cells on the surface (2D) with columns of material below that are broken into layers. (For those familiar with HRUs, each cell can be seen as similar to an HRU connected in series to its neighbors.) In the diagram part of the unsaturated zone is shown as transparent so that the gridded water table surface beneath can be more easily visualised. Figure source: DHI (2019). MIKE SHE Manual, Volume 1: User Guide, MIKE 2017 (Danish Hydrologic Institute).		Hybrid approach - different unit types for modelling different processes: Illustration of the more lumped, conceptual approach for representing interflow and groundwater flow with 'linear reservoir' units in MIKE-SHE. Other processes can still be modelled by grid cell. Interflow reservoirs have spatial extents and each receives percolating water from the grid cells that overly it. Similarly if multiple different mapped baseflow reservoirs (distinct aquifers) are included, these are recharged by overlying interflow units. SWAT2012 also uses a hybrid approach in that surface flow and 'lateral' flow (interflow) is modelled at the HRU scale, while the aquifer spans the subcatchment an is recharged by all the overlying HRUs. Figure source: DHI (2019). MIKE SHE Manual, Volume 2: Reference Guide, MIKE 2017 (Danish Hydrologic Institute).

Model structure overviews by tool (for MIKE-SHE two generalised set-up approaches are used in these comparisons. These are described here.)

Level / Element	WRSM-Pitman (Sami GW)	SPATSIM-Pitman (Hughes GW)	ACRU4	SWAT2012	MIKE-SHE, semi-distributed, more conceptual	MIKE-SHE, fully-distributed, more physical
Catchments & subcatchments (subcats)	WRSM catchments are composed of ‘modules’ linked in a user-specified network. Module types: runoff modules, special area modules (see below) channel modules reservoir modules Subcatchments are not explicitly input, but runoff modules and sets of linked modules act as subcats.	SPATSIM catchments are composed of subcatchments. Subcats are linked in spatially determined flow network (map input).	ACRU4 catchments are composed of subcatchments Subcats are linked in a user-specified flow network.	SWAT catchments are composed of subcatchments Subcats are linked in a spatially determined flow network (delineated by SWAT from DEM input, or given as a map input)	MIKE catchments can be composed of subcatchments Subcats are linked in spatially determined flow network (map input).	MIKE catchments can be composed of 3D grid units. The surface is uniformly sized grid cells. Each cell has a column beneath: input layers of soil, sediment, rock. No subcat boundaries are input; grid cells have elevation (DEM input) and water elevation on the surface and in the 3D grid drive flow.
Units within subcatchments	A WRSM ‘runoff module’ with no linked special areas functions as a subcat. If special area modules are linked, then a set of modules functions as a subcat.   Special area modules that can be added are: afforestation (tree plantation), alien vegetation, irrigated crops mines These appear as separate units, but function as sub-areas inside a specified linked runoff module. Runoff modules can also have internally specified subareas: impervious area riparian area (ET from GW).	SPATSIM subcatchments all contain a river channel and may have specified special sub-areas. Subcats can optionally include either a wetland or a reservoir/lake on the channel at the subcat outlet. A special sub-area can be defined for any, or all, of the following in a subcat: impervious area riparian area (ET from GW) area with a higher ET land cover (forest, tree plantation, alien veg) crop irrigated from dams crop irrigated from river small dams internal to subcat (lumped) Impervious, high ET cover, and irrigation areas do not have defined spatial locations within the subcat.	ACRU4 subcatchments are composed of one or more HRUs. Non-headwater subcats must contain a river channel. Subcats can optionally include additional channels and reservoir units. Units are linked in a user-specified network. There are special HRUs for: impervious areas, irrigated areas, riparian areas wetlands. For most HRUs, all runoff is routed directly to a channel, reservoir, or subcat outlet node (in parallel). Optional exceptions: For ‘riparian HRUs’, ‘baseflow’ output from other HRUs can be routed to the riparian HRU soil. For ‘adjunct-impervious HRUs’, runoff is routed to the surface of another HRU.	SWAT subcatchments are composed of: HRUs (many) shallow aquifer unit, deep aquifer unit, tributary channel unit main river channel unit. Subcats can include an internal pond or wetland and a reservoir/lake on the channel at the subcat outlet. HRU surface & ‘lateral’ runoff output is routed directly to the subcat channel (in parallel). This passes via the tributary channel, where delays & infiltration can occur, to the main channel. Groundwater is modelled at the subcat scale. Aquifers are recharged by all subcat HRUs. Shallow aquifer outflow goes to the subcat main channel.	MIKE-SHE subcatchments are composed of: grid cells (veg & soil) ‘overland flow zones’, ‘interflow reservoirs’ ‘baseflow reservoirs’ river channel links Surface runoff is lumped for grid cells within an overland flow zone & routed across zones in a downslope series to the channel (potential for infiltration on route). Interflow reservoirs receive percolation from overlying grid cells. Interflow is laterally routed through a downslope series of reservoirs to the channel (potential for loss to recharge on route). Baselfow reservoirs are recharged by overlying interflow reservoirs and outflow to the channel in parallel.	Using fully distributed MIKE-SHE, no subcat boundaries are input. Relative water surface or head elevations on the surface and in the 3D grid units drives flow exchange between units.   Surface and subsurface properties for the grid cells & layers are input for different zones (map input). Different sets of zone polygons can be used for the different types of properties (e.g. vegetation types, soil types, aquifer extents); they do not need to be aligned with one another.
River channels	WRSM channels are modules in the network with multiple inflow and outflow links possible. Channel modules can have an associated wetland storage/area.	SPATSIM channels are units linked to subcats (one per subcat). They receive the local subcat runoff & upstream subcat channel outflows.	ACRU4 channels are units in a subcat network of units. (necessary in non-headwater subcats). They receive runoff from linked HRUs, reservoirs, & upstream subcat outflows.	SWAT channels are units linked to subcats (one main channel per subcat). They receive the local subcat runoff & upstream subcat channel outflows.	MIKE channels are composed of spatially explicit reaches between node points. Reaches with nodes mapped inside a subcat exchange water with the subcat.	MIKE channels are composed of spatially explicit reaches between node points. Reaches can exchange water with grid cells that border them.

Links between discretisation and process representation

The scale of discretisation of the landscape influences which hydrological processes are individually represented and the algorithms and the timesteps that are appropriate (discussed in more detail here). In general, for larger spatial/vertical units, longer timesteps, more lumped process representation, and different property parameters are applicable compared to modelling with smaller units. This has to do with how long it’s likely to take for water to move through a modelled unit. For example, it may take a week for interflow to move through the 10 km long hillslope of subcatchment, but a day to move through the 1 km slope length of a patch of grassland within that subcatchment. Speeds vary by process. This also has to do with the fact that what we may model as one process at a larger spatial scale can be the result of several different processes occurring at smaller scales. For example, rain falling on a steep, rocky cliff may form surface runoff. However, if this surface runoff then flows across an area of permeable and unsaturated soil before reaching a stream channel, some may infiltrate and not reach the stream as surface flow. If one models a subcatchment where this is happening as a single unit, the equation and parameters for estimating ‘surface runoff generation’ would account for the net outcome of the surface runoff that actually reaches the stream, i.e. the combined impact of the cliff and the permeable toe-slope on surface runoff reaching the channel. If modelling the cliff and the toe-slope as separate units, surface runoff on the cliff unit could be calculated and then surface flow and infiltration on the toe-slope unit could be calculated as a separate set of processes. 

Timesteps & spatial units for different processes

Units	WRSM-Pitman (Sami GW)	SPATSIM-Pitman (Hughes GW)	ACRU4	SWAT2012	MIKE-SHE, semi-distributed, more conceptual	MIKE-SHE, fully-distributed, more physical
Timesteps	Monthly* A daily version has been developed. Limited use to-date	Monthly* A daily version has been developed. Limited use to-date	Daily	Daily, subdaily	Daily, subdaily* Timesteps are dynamic, vary by process & unit size. Outputs saved for the same selected step.	Daily, subdaily* Timesteps are dynamic, vary by process & unit size. Outputs saved for the same selected step.
Spatial units for:
Climate input	Modules (all)	Subcatchments	Subcatchments or HRUs* *HRU-scale input is labor intensive	Subcatchments	Grid cells or zones	Grid cells or zones
Surface & shallow subsurface processes	Runoff modules + special area modules	Subcatchments (+ internal special sub-areas)	HRUs	HRUs	Grid cells + Overland flow zones + Interflow reservoir zones	Grid cells
Groundwater processes	Runoff modules	Subcatchments	HRUs	Subcatchments	Baseflow reservoir zones	Grid cells

Specific units, layers, & connections

Basic layers: land cover, soil & unsaturated zone, aquifers

The tables below describe in more detail how the modelling tools can represent the distribution of land cover types, soil types, and aquifer types in a catchment and vertical distribution of soil, sediment, and rock types using the modelling units described above and layers within these units. The linkages or routing of water between units and layers is highlighted here, and covered in more detail in sections on process algorithms.

Land cover

NB: For MIKE-SHE two generalised set-up approaches are used in these comparisons. These are described here.

Land cover: spatial distribution & type limitations

Component	WRSM-Pitman (Sami GW)	SPATSIM-Pitman (Hughes GW)	ACRU4	SWAT2012	MIKE-SHE, semi-distributed, more conceptual	MIKE-SHE, fully-distributed, more physical
Spatial units for land cover type/property distribution	Modules & sub-areas within them	Subcatchments & sub-areas within them	HRUs	HRUs	Cover type polygons applied to grid cells	Cover type polygons applied to grid cells
	Extents of cover types are either defined in the: ‘runoff module’ set-up special area modules (which are tied to, and act as sub-areas of, a ‘runoff module’) Each runoff module can have different general cover specifications & linked special areas.	Extents of cover types are defined as special sub-areas within a subcat. Each subcat can have different general cover & sub-areas specifications.	Each HRU has its own cover & vegetation parameters.	Each HRU has cover & vegetation parameters. HRUs are assigned cover types using an input cover type map. Properties are input by type.	Each grid cell is assigned a cover type using an input cover type map. Properties are input by type.	Each grid cell is assigned a cover type using an input cover type map. Properties are input by type.
Limitations to types & number of types	Yes	Yes	No	No	No	No
	Types that can be represented: General vegetation (runoff module parameters) Impervious area (runoff module parameters) Riparian zone vegetation (runoff module parameters) Afforestation (special module, 1 per runoff module) Invasive alien vegetation (special module, 1 per runoff module) Irrigated crops (special module, multiple per runoff module) Mines (special area module)	Types that can be represented: General subcat vegetation Impervious area Higher ET vegetation (forest, tree plantation, alien veg) Irrigated crops Only one area (one type) of each of these broad classes can be represented within a given subcat.	No limit on number of HRUs (hence cover types) per subcat.	No limit on number of HRUs or cover types per subcat.	No limit to number of cover types.	No limit to number of cover types.

Soils & unsaturated zone

NB: For MIKE-SHE two generalised set-up approaches are used in these comparisons. These are described here.

Soils & unsaturated zone (UZ) material: spatial distribution, vertical layers, connections

Component	WRSM-Pitman (Sami GW)	SPATSIM-Pitman (Hughes GW)	ACRU4	SWAT2012	MIKE-SHE, semi-distributed, more conceptual	MIKE-SHE, fully-distributed, more physical
Spatial units for distribution of soil types / properties	Runoff modules & irrigation modules	Subcatchments	HRUs	HRUs	Soil type polygons applied to grid cells & ‘Interflow reservoir’ extent polygons	Soil type polygons applied to grid cells
	Each ‘runoff module’ can have its own soil moisture store & ‘percolation storage’ properties. Afforestation & alien veg modules use the soil of the runoff module they are linked to / part of. Irrigation modules have their own soil properties.	Each subcat can have its own soil moisture store properties.	Each HRU can have its own soil properties	Each HRU can have its own soil properties. HRUs are assigned soil types using an input soil type map. Properties are input by soil type. Individual HRU soil properties can by modified.	Each grid cell is assigned a soil type using an input soil type map.   Interflow reservoir ‘type’ extents are input as a map (boundaries do not need to align with soil types or subcatchments)	Each grid cell is assigned a soil type using an input soil type map.
Vertical layers in soil or UZ profile	2 Layers	1 Layer	2 Layers	11 Layers (max)	2(3) Layers*	Unlimited Layers
	A runoff modules has 2 ‘UZ’ layers: Soil moisture storage Percolation lag storage	A subcat has a single soil moisture storage unit.	An HRU has 2 soil layers: A horizon   B horizon Both in root zone.	A soil type can have up to 10 layers (user input layers). Profile can extend below root zone. Each HRU also has a vadose zone (lag storage) ‘layer’ below the soil profile	A soil type has vertically uniform parameters (no layers), but each model grid cell has 2 computational UZ layers: Upper layer (root zone) Lower layer (below roots) Interflow reservoirs are storage units fed by all overlying grid cells	A soil type can have an unlimited number of layers (user input layers). Profile can extend below root zone.
Surface runoff routing (w.r.t. spatial units)	Parallel*	(n/a)	Parallel	Parallel	Series or parallel	Series
	Parallel for runoff modules & irrigation modules. Other special area modules modify runoff module flow	Subcatchment scale	Parallel from HRUs in subcat	Parallel from HRUs in subcat	Across a series of mapped flow zones within a subcat OR each zone in parallel	Across grid cells based on elevation.
Interflow routing (w.r.t. spatial units)	Parallel*	(n/a)	Parallel	Parallel	Series	Series
	Parallel for runoff modules & irrigation modules Other special area modules modify runoff module flow	Subcatchment scale	Parallel from HRUs in subcat	Parallel from HRUs in subcat	Through a series of interflow reservoirs in a subcat	Through grid cells based on head.
Capillary rise: 2-way connection to aquifer	Yes*	Yes*	No*	Yes	Yes*	Yes
	Only in riparian zone sub-area of runoff module; represented as ET deficit met by GW	Only in riparian zone sub-area of subcat; represented as ET deficit met by GW	Water in the baseflow store of an ACRU4 HRU cannot move into the soil profile or be used for ET in the same HRU. BUT when upland HRU baseflow is routed to riparian HRU soil this is similar to GW access in riparian zones in subcat scale models....	Represented as ET deficit met by GW; access can be set by HRU	Only for grid cells in riparian zone (lowest interflow zone); represented as ET deficit met by GW

Aquifers

NB: For MIKE-SHE two generalised set-up approaches are used in these comparisons. These are described here.

Aquifers: spatial distribution, vertical layers, connections

Component	WRSM-Pitman (Sami GW)	SPATSIM-Pitman (Hughes GW)	ACRU4	SWAT2012	MIKE-SHE, semi-distributed, more conceptual	MIKE-SHE, fully-distributed, more physical
Spatial units for distribution of aquifer types / properties	Runoff modules	Subcatchments	HRUs	Subcatchments/HRUs*	‘Baseflow reservoir’ extent polygons	Layer & lense polygons applied to grid cells
	Each runoff module can have its own aquifer properties.	Each subcatchment module can have its own aquifer properties. There is a spatial division into two slope sections, riparian & upslope, for process calculation, but these don’t have separate property parameters.	Each HRU can have its own ‘baseflow storage’ properties.	Aquifer GW storage & outflow is calculated per subcat, but properties can be input per HRU to model capillary rise	‘Baseflow reservoir’ type (aquifer type) spatial extents are input as a map (boundaries do not need to align with other inputs)	Each grid cell has a layered profile of aquifer material types based on the layers and lenses it overlies.   Property ‘layers’ cover entire the model domain, can have spatially variable thickness (grid input). ‘Lenses’ occur in certain areas (map input) also with variable thickness.
Vertical layers within aquifers	1 Layer	1 Layer	1 Layer	2 Layers	2 Layers	Unlimited Layers
	A runoff module has one aquifer unit	A subcat has one aquifer store. There a two linked horizontal sub sections, but no vertical divisions.	An HRU has one ‘baseflow’ storage.	A subcat has 2 aquifer units: shallow aquifer (outflow to channel) deep aquifer (no outflow)	A mapped ‘baseflow reservoir’ type can have 2 internal storage units with different parameters.	No limit on the aquifer material layers & lenses that can be input. Calculation grid layers can be set differently to the aquifer property layers. In this case thickness-averaged parameters are assigned.
GW flow routing between spatial units	Yes	Yes	(Limited)	No	No	Yes
	GW flow between subcats	GW flow between subcats	No GW flow between subcats Upslope HRU baseflow can be routed to riparian HRU soil within a subcat No other HRU GW exchanges included	No GW flow between subcats	No GW flow between subcats No GW flow between ‘baseflow reservoirs’ (aquifer types) within subcat	GW flow between grid cells
GW flow routing vertical aquifer units/layers	(n/a – single unit)	(n/a – single unit)	(n/a – single unit)	No	No	Yes
				Shallow & deep aquifers each receive a portion of total recharge and do not interact (more like units than vertical layers)	The 2 units in a mapped baseflow reservoir type each receive a portion of total recharge and do not interact (more like units than vertical layers)	GW can flow between vertical layers based on head and conductivity
GW flow out of model domain (catchment)	Yes	Yes	No	Yes*	No*	Yes
				Only deep aquifer can have GW flow the model. (Deep aquifer does not feed channel, can be pumped)	Recharge can be allocated to ‘dead storage’ which has a similar impact.	GW outflow boundary condition must be set-up
GW abstraction included	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	Yes
Number of abstraction points allowed	1 per runoff module	2 total per subcat: 1 per subcat aquifer section: 1 upslope & 1 riparian	(n/a)	2 total per subcat: 1 per subcat aquifer unit: 1 shallow & 1 deep	Flexible number, location, & abstraction depth	Flexible number, location, & abstraction depth
GW abstraction routing options	Removed from model	Removed from model	(n/a)	Applied as irrigation, or Removed from model	Applied as irrigation, or Removed from model	Applied as irrigation, or Removed from model

River channel network & reservoirs/lakes

NB: For MIKE-SHE two generalised set-up approaches are used in these comparisons. These are described here.

River channels: units & layout, connections with surface & subsurface land units

Component	WRSM-Pitman (Sami GW)	SPATSIM-Pitman (Hughes GW)	ACRU4	SWAT2012	MIKE-SHE, semi-distributed, more conceptual	MIKE-SHE, fully-distributed, more physical
Number of channel units by subcatchment (or catchment)	Flexible	1 per subcat	Flexible	1 per subcat*	Flexible	Flexible
	Channels represented with channel modules in a network. No limit to number of channel modules. Multiple connection configurations possible: max 10 input & 10 output routes per channel module.	Subcat channel receives flow from the channels of upstream subcats & flows out to channel of downstream subcat.	Multiple channel units can be included in a network in a subcat. In non-headwater subcats a channel is needed to receive flow from upstream subcats & route to the subcat’s outflow node. Each special riparian HRU & wetland HRU needs its own linked channel unit. No limit to the number of channel units included.	Each subcat has one ‘main channel’ that receives flows from main channels of any upstream subcats & flows out to channel of downstream subcat. Each subcat also has one conceptual ‘tributary’ that routes HRU runoff to main channel. This allows for additional delay & loss to aquifer if relevant.	Channels are represented as a spatially explicit network of reaches between calculation nodes (cross sections) at specified intervals. Reaches with nodes mapped in subcat can exchange water with that subcat. No limits to numbers of river branches or of reach units that can be in a subcat.	Channels are represented as a spatially explicit network of reaches between calculation nodes (cross sections) at specified intervals. Reaches exchange water with grid cells that border them. No limits to numbers of river branches or of reach units in a model. There cannot be two reaches in one grid cell (node spacing compatible with grid)
Surface flow from land units into channel	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
	Runoff, irrigation, mine modules to a linked channel module	Subcat to its channel	HRU to linked channel in subcat	All HRUs in subcat to tributary then subcat main channel	‘Overland flow’ zones in subcat to reaches in subcat. Series routing: only from most downslope zone	Grid cells bordering a reach to that reach (if flow is over bank height)
Flow from channel onto land surface (overbank flooding)	(to wetland unit only)	(to wetland unit only)	(to special riparian HRUs & wetland HRUs only)	No	Yes	Yes
	A wetland can be included within a channel module.	A wetland can be included at downstream end of subcat.	Special HRUs for riparian areas and wetlands can be included. Each needs its own linked channel unit with an overflow threshold.	A wetland can be included in a subcat, but it is not on the ‘main channel’ or fed by overflow.	Channel flow over capacity is routed onto floodplain surface. This water can infiltrate into flooded grid cells.	Channel reach to bordering grid cells
Interflow into channel	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes*
	Runoff, irrigation, mine modules to a linked channel module	Subcat to its channel	HRU to a linked channel in subcat	All HRUs in subcat to tributary then subcat main channel	Most downslope ‘interflow reservoir’ in subcat to reaches in subcat.	Perched, temporarily saturated layers (‘interflow’) handled in ‘saturated zone’. A channel can receive water from such a layer
Flow from channel into unsaturated zone (transmission loss)	No	No	No	Yes*	No	Yes*
	Channel transmission loss leaves the model	Channel transmission loss only to aquifer	No channel transmission loss	Main channel transmission loss goes to ‘bank storage’ – accessible for ET, not part of subcat aquifers.		Perched, temporarily saturated layers (‘interflow’) handled in ‘saturated zone’. A channel can lose water to such a layer.
Groundwater (GW) flow into channel	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
	Runoff module to a linked channel module	Subcat downslope aquifer portion to subcat channel	HRU to a linked channel in subcat	Subcat shallow aquifer to channel (not from the deep aquifer)	All ‘baseflow reservoirs’ in subcat to reaches in subcat	Saturated layers of grid cells bordering a reach to that reach
Flow from channel into GW (transmission loss)	No	Yes	No	No*	Yes	Yes
	Channel transmission loss leaves the model	Channel to subcat aquifer (downslope portion)	No channel transmission loss	Main channel transmission loss does not enter subcat aquifer. Tributary can lose to subcat shallow aquifer	Reach in subcat to baseflow reservoir in subcat	Reach to saturated layers of grid cells bordering it
Abstractions: water leave model	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
Transfers: between channels	Yes	No	No	Yes	Yes* (complex set-up)	Yes* (complex set-up)
External water inputs	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
Abstraction, transfer, external input locations	Flexible (avoiding circular routing)	Subcat channel outlet  (above reservoir)	Flexible	Subcat main channel outlet (above reservoir)	Flexible	Flexible

Water bodies (dams, reservoirs, lakes): unit types, inflow & outflow connections

Component	WRSM-Pitman (Sami GW)	SPATSIM-Pitman (Hughes GW)	ACRU4	SWAT2012	MIKE-SHE, All approaches
Water body unit types	1 type*: Reservoir module	2 types*: Reservoir & Dam	1 type: Dam	3 types*: Reservoir, Pond, Depression	2 approaches: explicit bathymetry+wall, storage unit
	Wetlands modelled as water body; different unit type (see below)	Wetlands modelled as water body; different unit type (see below)		Wetlands modelled as water body; different unit type (see below)
Number of units allowed per subcatchment (or catchment)	Flexible	1 Reservoir per subcat & 1 Dam per subcat	Flexible	1 Reservoir per subcat & 1 Pond per subcat & multiple Depressions	Flexible
Flows into water body units	Reservoir module can receive: Rain Flow/transfers from up to 5 other modules routed to it (land areas, channels, & other reservoir modules) - from runoff modules it can receive a set proportion of total total runoff. External source input routed to it A reservoir receiving a set proportion of runoff from a runoff-module can be thought of as internal to the subcat that the runoff module represents. If it receives all the runoff, it’s at the subcat outlet.	A reservoir is on the subcat channel at the outlet, so receives: Rain Local subcat runoff Channel flow from upstream A dam is internal to a subcat & receives: Set proportion of total subcat runoff	A dam can receive: Rain Flow from channels & HRUs routed to it External source input routed to it	A reservoir is on the subcat channel at the outlet, so can receive: Rain Local subcat runoff Channel flow from upstream subcats Transfers from channels & reservoirs in other subcats A pond is internal to a subcat & receives: Rain Set proportion of total subcat runoff A depression/pothole is ponded water ON a specified HRU & receives: Rain Set proportion of runoff from other specified HRUs in same subcat	Waterbodies are handled in the channel hydraulic model (MIKE-Hydro). Waterbody bathymetry cross sections and the dimensions of a dam wall can be input in a reach of the channel. The reach could receive: Rain Runoff from bordering units (cells, zones) Channel flow from upstream reach Transfers from other reaches External point source inputs Alternatively a simple 'storage' volume unit can be added to the end of a channel branch, which receives flow from the branch.
Flows out of water body units	Water can leave a reservoir module as: Evaporation Overflow & controlled release to linked channel module downstream Withdrawal to linked irrigation modules Withdrawal transferred other reservoirs & channels Withdrawal removed from model A reservoir can have a maximum of 5 outflow routes.	Water can leave reservoir as: Evaporation Overflow & controlled release to downstream subcat channel Withdrawal removed from model Water can leave a dam as: Overflow to subcat channel Withdrawal to subcat irrigation sub-area	Water can leave a dam as: Evaporation Overflow, controlled release, & seepage to linked downstream channel or subcat outflow node Withdrawal to linked irrigation HRU Withdrawal removed from model	Water can leave a reservoir as: Evaporation Overflow & controlled release to downstream subcat channel Seepage to deep aquifer (effectively leaving model) Withdrawal to linked irrigation HRU Withdrawal transferred other reservoirs & channels Withdrawal removed from model Water can leave a pond as: Evaporation Overflow & controlled release to downstream subcat channel Seepage to deep aquifer (effectively leaving model) Water can leave a depression water body as: Evaporation Overflow & controlled releases to subcat main channel Seepage to local HRU soil (local HRU also has: veg ET & subsurface runoff generation)	Water can leave a reach storage created with bathymetry & a wall structure as: Evaporation Overflow & controlled release to downstream reach Seepage to bordering unit groundwater Withdrawal to linked irrigation area Withdrawal transferred other reservoirs & channels Withdrawal removed from model Water can leave a ‘storage’ volume unit as: Overflow to a downstream branch

Wetlands

'Wetlands' are challenging to generalise about as a landscape feature because a diverse range of hydro-geomorphic settings can give rise to a frequently saturated area. The modelling tools take some different approaches to representing wetlands, as described in more detail on a dedicated wetlands page, here. The table below is a brief overview of the connectivity of wetland modules or units in the tools.

NB: For MIKE-SHE two generalised set-up approaches are used in these comparisons. These are described here.

Irrigated areas

NB: For MIKE-SHE two generalised set-up approaches are used in these comparisone. These are described here.