Difference between revisions of "Applying tools in specific use cases"
Peni Metho (talk | contribs) |
Peni Metho (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
=== '''- Wetlands''' === | === '''- Wetlands''' === | ||
| − | The definition of wetland representation and an outline of the fundamental wetland descriptions which differentiate wetlands in modelling tools is presented in the '''[[ | + | The definition of wetland representation and an outline of the fundamental wetland descriptions which differentiate wetlands in modelling tools is presented in the '''[[wetlands]]''' page. |
=== '''- Irrigation''' === | === '''- Irrigation''' === | ||
Revision as of 08:06, 8 June 2021
Suggestions relevant to applying different tools to specific use cases - can make separate pages for each and link them to a list here if there is sufficient material
- IAP & afforestation
- Riparian zones
- Wetlands
The definition of wetland representation and an outline of the fundamental wetland descriptions which differentiate wetlands in modelling tools is presented in the wetlands page.
- Irrigation
This section provides a summary of how the various tools represent irrigation from different sources. A detailed description of irrigation representation is found here.
Irrigation from groundwater
● Pitman tools & ACRU: Do not include irrigation from groundwater. ACRU does not include any groundwater withdrawal. Work-arounds in the Pitman tools do not allow for dynamic curtailment of irrigation when groundwater supplies are low.
Irrigation from reservoirs
● MIKE-SHE appears not to include irrigation from storage reservoirs, only runoff river and groundwater
Irrigation from multiple sources
● Pitman tools, ACRU, & SWAT only allow an irrigated area to be irrigated from one source, while MIKE-SHE allows multiple sources to be drawn upon in sequence to meet demands.
- Small farm dams
- Groundwater pumping
DEMO TABLE TEMPLATE TESTING
| Characteristic | WRSM-Pitman | SPATSIM-Pitman | ACRU | SWAT | MIKE-SHE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|