Difference between revisions of "Applying tools in specific use cases"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Suggestions relevant to applying different tools to specific use cases - can make separate pages for each and link them to a list here if there is sufficient material | Suggestions relevant to applying different tools to specific use cases - can make separate pages for each and link them to a list here if there is sufficient material | ||
| − | '''- IAP & afforestation''' | + | === '''- IAP & afforestation''' === |
| − | '''- Riparian zones''' | + | === '''- Riparian zones''' === |
| − | '''- Wetlands''' | + | === '''- Wetlands''' === |
| − | '''- Irrigation''' | + | === '''- Irrigation''' === |
| − | + | This section provides a summary of how the various tools represent irrigation from different sources. A detailed description of irrigation representation is found [[Irrigation|here.]] | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| + | ==== '''Irrigation from groundwater''' ==== | ||
● Pitman tools & ACRU: Do not include irrigation from groundwater. ACRU does not include any groundwater withdrawal. Work-arounds in the Pitman tools do not allow for dynamic curtailment of irrigation when groundwater supplies are low. | ● Pitman tools & ACRU: Do not include irrigation from groundwater. ACRU does not include any groundwater withdrawal. Work-arounds in the Pitman tools do not allow for dynamic curtailment of irrigation when groundwater supplies are low. | ||
| − | '''Irrigation from reservoirs''' | + | ==== '''Irrigation from reservoirs''' ==== |
| − | |||
● MIKE-SHE appears not to include irrigation from storage reservoirs, only runoff river and groundwater | ● MIKE-SHE appears not to include irrigation from storage reservoirs, only runoff river and groundwater | ||
| − | '''Irrigation from multiple sources''' | + | ==== '''Irrigation from multiple sources''' ==== |
| − | |||
● Pitman tools, ACRU, & SWAT only allow an irrigated area to be irrigated from one source, while MIKE-SHE allows multiple sources to be drawn upon in sequence to meet demands. | ● Pitman tools, ACRU, & SWAT only allow an irrigated area to be irrigated from one source, while MIKE-SHE allows multiple sources to be drawn upon in sequence to meet demands. | ||
| − | '''- Small farm dams''' | + | === '''- Small farm dams''' === |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| + | === '''- Groundwater pumping''' === | ||
DEMO TABLE TEMPLATE TESTING | DEMO TABLE TEMPLATE TESTING | ||
Revision as of 11:46, 3 June 2021
Suggestions relevant to applying different tools to specific use cases - can make separate pages for each and link them to a list here if there is sufficient material
- IAP & afforestation
- Riparian zones
- Wetlands
- Irrigation
This section provides a summary of how the various tools represent irrigation from different sources. A detailed description of irrigation representation is found here.
Irrigation from groundwater
● Pitman tools & ACRU: Do not include irrigation from groundwater. ACRU does not include any groundwater withdrawal. Work-arounds in the Pitman tools do not allow for dynamic curtailment of irrigation when groundwater supplies are low.
Irrigation from reservoirs
● MIKE-SHE appears not to include irrigation from storage reservoirs, only runoff river and groundwater
Irrigation from multiple sources
● Pitman tools, ACRU, & SWAT only allow an irrigated area to be irrigated from one source, while MIKE-SHE allows multiple sources to be drawn upon in sequence to meet demands.
- Small farm dams
- Groundwater pumping
DEMO TABLE TEMPLATE TESTING
| Characteristic | WRSM-Pitman | SPATSIM-Pitman | ACRU | SWAT | MIKE-SHE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|