Difference between revisions of "Process representation across tools"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | process representation | + | |
+ | ''' PAGE IN PROGRESS - MORE COMING SOON! ''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | building process representation overview tables + links to more specific pages about individual processes | ||
== Canopy interception and evaporation vs throughfall == | == Canopy interception and evaporation vs throughfall == |
Revision as of 12:13, 31 October 2022
PAGE IN PROGRESS - MORE COMING SOON!
building process representation overview tables + links to more specific pages about individual processes
Canopy interception and evaporation vs throughfall
Algorithm description | WRSM-Pitman
(Sami GW) |
SPATSIM-Pitman
(Hughes GW) |
ACRU
(ACRU4) |
SWAT
(ArcSWAT2012) |
MIKE-SHE,
semi-distributed & fully distributed |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Algorithm inputs |
|
|
|
Canopy interception is not explicitly modelled
when using daily timestep modelling. It is implicitly considered in the ‘initial abstraction’, see infiltration & surface runoff below |
|
Function type | exponential & threshold | exponential & threshold | threshold | threshold | |
Thresholds | yes:
timestep interception capacity (calculated) |
yes:
timestep interception capacity (calculated) |
yes:
timestep interception capacity (calculated) |
yes:
timestep interception capacity (calculated)) |