Difference between revisions of "Applying tools in specific use cases"

From Hydromodel SA Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Change font format)
(font changes)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Suggestions relevant to applying different tools to specific use cases - can make separate pages for each and link them to a list here if there is sufficient material
 
Suggestions relevant to applying different tools to specific use cases - can make separate pages for each and link them to a list here if there is sufficient material
  
- IAP & afforestation
+
'''- IAP & afforestation'''
  
- Riparian zones
+
'''- Riparian zones'''
  
- Wetlands
+
'''- Wetlands'''
  
- Irrigation
+
'''- Irrigation'''
  
 
''This section provides a summary of how the various tools represent irrigation from deffrent sources. A detailed case study description of irrigation representation is found [[Irrigation|here.]]''
 
''This section provides a summary of how the various tools represent irrigation from deffrent sources. A detailed case study description of irrigation representation is found [[Irrigation|here.]]''
  
'''Irrigation from groundwater'''
+
'''''Irrigation from groundwater'''''
  
 
● Pitman tools & ACRU: Do not include irrigation from groundwater. ACRU does not include any groundwater withdrawal. Work-arounds in the Pitman tools do not allow for dynamic curtailment of irrigation when groundwater supplies are low.
 
● Pitman tools & ACRU: Do not include irrigation from groundwater. ACRU does not include any groundwater withdrawal. Work-arounds in the Pitman tools do not allow for dynamic curtailment of irrigation when groundwater supplies are low.
  
'''Irrigation from reservoirs'''
+
'''''Irrigation from reservoirs'''''
  
 
● MIKE-SHE appears not to include irrigation from storage reservoirs, only runoff river and groundwater
 
● MIKE-SHE appears not to include irrigation from storage reservoirs, only runoff river and groundwater
  
'''Irrigation from multiple sources'''
+
'''''Irrigation from multiple sources'''''
  
 
● Pitman tools, ACRU, & SWAT only allow an irrigated area to be irrigated from one source, while MIKE-SHE allows multiple sources to be drawn upon in sequence to meet demands.
 
● Pitman tools, ACRU, & SWAT only allow an irrigated area to be irrigated from one source, while MIKE-SHE allows multiple sources to be drawn upon in sequence to meet demands.
  
- Small farm dams
+
'''- Small farm dams'''
 +
 
 +
'''- Groundwater pumping'''
  
- Groundwater pumping
 
  
  

Revision as of 11:37, 3 June 2021

Suggestions relevant to applying different tools to specific use cases - can make separate pages for each and link them to a list here if there is sufficient material

- IAP & afforestation

- Riparian zones

- Wetlands

- Irrigation

This section provides a summary of how the various tools represent irrigation from deffrent sources. A detailed case study description of irrigation representation is found here.

Irrigation from groundwater

● Pitman tools & ACRU: Do not include irrigation from groundwater. ACRU does not include any groundwater withdrawal. Work-arounds in the Pitman tools do not allow for dynamic curtailment of irrigation when groundwater supplies are low.

Irrigation from reservoirs

● MIKE-SHE appears not to include irrigation from storage reservoirs, only runoff river and groundwater

Irrigation from multiple sources

● Pitman tools, ACRU, & SWAT only allow an irrigated area to be irrigated from one source, while MIKE-SHE allows multiple sources to be drawn upon in sequence to meet demands.

- Small farm dams

- Groundwater pumping


DEMO TABLE TEMPLATE TESTING

TEMPLATE TABLE
Characteristic WRSM-Pitman SPATSIM-Pitman ACRU SWAT MIKE-SHE