Difference between revisions of "Process representation across tools"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
|} | |} | ||
| − | == Infiltration into soil moisture (SM) == | + | == Infiltration into soil moisture (SM) == |
| − | == Surface water generation of landscape units == | + | == Surface water generation of landscape units == |
| − | == Surface runoff to channel network == | + | == Surface runoff to channel network == |
| − | == Evapotranspiration (ET) from soil moisture (SM) == | + | == Evapotranspiration (ET) from soil moisture (SM) == |
== Evapotranspiration (ET) from groundwater (GW) == | == Evapotranspiration (ET) from groundwater (GW) == | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Interflow generation & routing to channel network == | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Aquifer recharge == | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Groundwater (GW) flow == | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Aquifer exchange with channel: aquifer outflow or channel transmission losses == | ||
Revision as of 22:33, 27 April 2021
process representation OVERVIEW tables - links to more specific pages about individual processes?
Canopy interception and evaporation vs throughfall
| Algorithm description | WRSM-Pitman
(Sami GW) |
SPATSIM-Pitman
(Hughes GW) |
ACRU
(ACRU4) |
SWAT
(ArcSWAT2012) |
MIKE-SHE,
semi-distributed & fully distributed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Algorithm inputs |
|
|
|
Canopy interception is not explicitly modelled
when using daily timestep modelling. It is implicitly considered in the ‘initial abstraction’, see infiltration & surface runoff below |
|
| Function type | exponential & threshold | exponential & threshold | threshold | threshold | |
| Thresholds | yes:
timestep interception capacity (calculated) |
yes:
timestep interception capacity (calculated) |
yes:
timestep interception capacity (calculated) |
yes:
timestep interception capacity (calculated)) |