Difference between revisions of "Process representation across tools"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
* Cover properties: max interception or LAI | * Cover properties: max interception or LAI | ||
* Canopy storage (state) | * Canopy storage (state) | ||
| − | | rowspan="3" | ''Canopy interception is not explicitly modelled'' | + | | rowspan="3" | ''Canopy interception is not explicitly modelled'' ''when using daily timestep modelling,'' ''but is implicitly considered in the'' ''‘initial abstraction’ calculation,'' ''see infiltration & surface runoff below'' |
| − | ''when using daily timestep modelling,'' | ||
| − | |||
| − | ''but is implicitly considered in the'' | ||
| − | |||
| − | ''‘initial abstraction’ calculation,'' | ||
| − | |||
| − | ''see infiltration & surface runoff below'' | ||
| | | | ||
* Rain | * Rain | ||
Revision as of 22:27, 27 April 2021
process representation OVERVIEW tables - links to more specific pages about individual processes?
Canopy interception and evaporation vs throughfall
| Process & algorithm description | WRSM-Pitman
(Sami GW) |
SPATSIM Pitman (Hughes GW) | ACRU
(ACRU4) |
SWAT
(ArcSWAT2012) |
MIKE-SHE,
semi-distributed & fully distributed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Algorithm inputs |
|
|
|
Canopy interception is not explicitly modelled when using daily timestep modelling, but is implicitly considered in the ‘initial abstraction’ calculation, see infiltration & surface runoff below |
|
| Function type | exponential & threshold | exponential & threshold | threshold | threshold | |
| Thresholds | yes:
timestep interception capacity (calculated) |
yes:
timestep interception capacity (calculated) |
yes:
timestep interception capacity (calculated) |
yes:
timestep interception capacity (calculated)) |